Jump to content
  TPR Home | Parks | Twitter | Facebook | YouTube | Instagram 

Besen

Members
  • Posts

    4
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Besen's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I just hope they'll make that one better than they did "Krake", which was a little too short and small (for a dive coaster) in my opinion. At least the layout and the first construction pics look more promising.
  2. I give you a 10/10 for the best quote about the entire dilemma I'd LOVE to see a coaster, where the restraints are actually going "quack". And to xSmKxGamegod: Thanks for the clarification. I don't think I'll ever get to ride it ... pretty far away from Central Europe.
  3. Really? Oh, my bad. Well I kinda read the pages, but not word for word and most information about that accident I got from other sources. And in one of them I read about that and I instantly thought of what I wrote. The amount of posts here right now is pretty huge and reading everything would just ... take too long compared to the time I have.
  4. Well, when I look at the seats and the restraints and put it next to the picture of the woman, I'm pretty sure, the station workers had to press pretty hard to get the restraint to "clack" just once (Actually, in an interview with a witness, they said it in deed locked just once and that the woman didn't feel safe about that). And that's, what shouldn't have been ... When it's that hard to lock the restraint, that person shouldn't be on the coaster. I was on a Top Spin once and I kinda like pressed the restraint down a too much and during the ride it released itself a little bit. Shock of my life, but nothing happened. I think, that's what happened to the woman due to her size and the negative G-forces. And because it was only locked once ... well, that happened.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use https://themeparkreview.com/forum/topic/116-terms-of-service-please-read/