Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Leviathan POV Video Posted!
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest
Discuss theme parks, roller coasters, and mules!
Racing for the sky
User avatar
 
Posts: 894
Joined: 26 Apr 2005
Location: On the internet
Gender: Male
Age: 22

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby coasterlover420 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:25 pm

^^^^I agree, Robb. Some people like feeling speed and wind through their hair etc...and some people go more for forces: +g, -g, acceleration, inversions...

I am more of a 'forces' person myself. I will love coasters tall, short, fast, slow, with/without inversions, out and back, twister...as long as it is interesting. As far as the length of Leviathan goes, the time from lift top to brake in that video (not sure on the load) is 55ish seconds, which I would not consider short for a roller coaster, and my feeling is that if there was more done with it, it would seem too long and uninteresting. Not to mention B&M coasters tend to be more expensive than say Intamin, seeing as Millennium Force is 1000 feet longer and cost $3M less. MF is only around 10 seconds longer anyway...

I have found that some things I don't think will be interesting on a coaster actually really surprise me, such as the first time I rode Magnum. It looks kinda dull and repetitive, but WOW! And similarly, I have found that some things I thought would be really exciting turned out to be boring or just lame to me, like the first time I rode a Premier spaghetti bowl coaster (FoF, Joker's Jinx, etc...). I am thinking that Leviathan as a whole doesn't really have anything that will stand out to me as a coaster enthusiast, but I bet it will be a really fun ride nonetheless, and I'm not going to skip it when I visit just because the airtime isn't good enough or the track isn't long enough.

PCW_Nut wrote:Wonderland now has 2 World class B&M's in their park, and that, is nothing but good!

This.
Last edited by coasterlover420 on Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:21 pm.
~Signature~

Am I allowed to eat donkey during lent?
User avatar
 
Posts: 1568
Joined: 16 Dec 2005
Location: Aliso Viejo, CA
Gender: Male
Age: 22

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby rcdude » Sun Apr 29, 2012 3:30 pm

The only thing I could see done differently with Leviathan's ending would be something similar to Intimidator: After the high brake run, have a dip, an inclined helix, and another dip onto the final brakes. However, given that the park already spent $28 million on a 5,400 ft ride over 300 ft tall, they figured they already had enough to it and didn't want to spend another million or two for a short additional segment. Either that, or B&M didn't want to chance anything going wrong (this is their largest coaster to date, after all), and designed a simple ending.

As for the ride itself, I'm looking forward to riding it this summer. It might be my favorite coaster, it might not be, but I'm almost certain it will make my top 25 list. No way to tell for sure until I ride. Based on what I've heard so far, I doubt it will appeal to everyone (not many coasters do anyway), but I'm pretty sure most enthusiasts would agree that Behemoth and Leviathan are the top two coasters at Canada's Wonderland. They may be somewhat similar, but I think both are different enough that it won't feel like having two of the same ride in one park.
Top 5 Steel: Bizarro (SFNE), Tatsu, Maverick, Kingda Ka, Top Thrill Dragster
Top 5 Wood: El Toro, Voyage, Boulder Dash, Thunderhead, Ravine Flyer II
Top 3 Parks: Busch Gardens Williamsburg, Holiday World, Cedar Point
TPR Trips: IntimidaTour 2010, North East Trip 2011, LeviaTHON 2012

Image

I Guess Donkeys Are Okay
User avatar
 
Posts: 27
Joined: 10 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Age: 26

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby BrianLo » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:05 pm

SharkTums wrote:Wait wait wait...the most exciting thing I've seen so far is I think the arcade that is near the ride is the one that had "Metric Skeeball"!!!!


Yes I can confirm it's still there, I took a look for you today.

When I grow up, I want to breed donkeys!
User avatar
 
Posts: 634
Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Location: Belgium
Gender: Male
Age: 38

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby Dragon Khan » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:16 pm

robbalvey wrote:
Dragon Khan wrote:^For some reason, I'm more inclined to believing in the opinion of people who have ridden it already


You know - people like what they like, and regardless if you agree with it or not, will form an opinion off a video using the experience of what they know. Personally, I happen to agree with Greg's assessment. I'm an "airtime guy", meaning I normally do not put coasters built for speed anywhere near the top of my list. That doesn't mean the ride won't deliver for some people. I mean, different strokes, right? Some dudes like cute butts, other like boobs. I think those people looking for the "airtime ride" will probably be in line for Behemoth, and those who like speed and more speed....I guess this is their thing.

And while I haven't ridden it yet either, based on my having been on pretty much every single B&M in the world (minus only a handful), if I had to place a bet, I'm probably more of a Behemoth man myself...and that's not a bad thing!

--Robb



I understand , Robb... I might even agree since I much prefer Dutch Goliath to Millie... What I meant in my post, was that the "long brake run" issue seems to be the fashionable element to put this new coaster down... Seriously, are there many pages on this thread where the brake run isn't mentionnend and criticised as a "flaw" (which it is not) or a waste of energy ? My answer to that was just that TTD and KK could ALSO have a gigantic layout following their 400 ft drop. They just don't (would probably double the coaster's pricetag) yet, nobody says those 2 awesome coasters are "a dud" (not my words...). As for LEvi / Behemoth, I totally agree that the majority of coaster enthusiast will prefer airtime over pure speed... complimentary experiences in the same park, but certainly not a "dud"...
Top woodies: 1: Boulder Dash / 2: El Toro/ 3: Prowler/ 4: Voyage/ 5: Hades
Top Steelies: 1: DRAGON KHAN / 2: Expedition Geforce / 3: Top Thrill Dragster/ 4: Goliath (Holland) / 5: Superman (Madrid)

Image

Don't put that donkey on the floor!
User avatar
 
Posts: 1633
Joined: 06 Sep 2007
Location: Toronto, Canada
Gender: Male
Age: 34

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby rollin_n_coastin » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:17 pm

Glad everyone is liking the POV and updates! Some great comments and observations so far!

Thanks everyone for checking out the coverage. If you haven't already, please check out and like the POV on YouTube here!

I should offer full disclosure. I am a huge Millennium Force fan so I found Leviathan to be exceptional. I also love i305 and Ride of Steel for similar reasons (don't judge me haha). What I think is cool about the two B&Ms at Canada's Wonderland is that they are so different that you can form an opinion as to which you like better quite clearly if you are more into airtime/ forces taking priority over speed. That's not to say that Leviathan doesn't have any airtime as it certainly has some funky/ strange stuff going on over the low to the ground sections, but that's just not its emphasis.

If you're someone who thinks Leviathan isn't long enough and needs other elements, then the ride is just not your type of ride and that is totally fair. Leviathan is plenty long and by the time you hit the block section, you'd be very satisfied if you're a fan of this style of coaster. Adding another type of element would make it strange, as if the designers didn't really know what this coaster's identity should be. Behemoth already has that other stuff and it's put to great use I think.
Last edited by rollin_n_coastin on Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:30 pm.
Image

Online
Challenge me at Donkey Kong...I dare ya!
User avatar
 
Posts: 885
Joined: 16 Jun 2010
Gender: Male

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby Intimidator305 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:21 pm

coasterlover420 wrote:Not to mention B&M coasters tend to be more expensive than say Intamin, seeing as Millennium Force is 1000 feet longer and cost $3M less.


Millennium Force was also built for 2000 and not 2012... That's 12 years for inflation of prices on everything.

The 5100' Intimidator 305 cost 25 million to build 2 years ago. That ride uses a minimal amount of supports, is low to the ground over half the layout, only has 2 trains, and was built on a flat piece of land.

When I grow up, I want to breed donkeys!
User avatar
 
Posts: 634
Joined: 17 Sep 2007
Location: Belgium
Gender: Male
Age: 38

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby Dragon Khan » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:32 pm

Totally forgot to add I love boobs and cute butts ! :b
Top woodies: 1: Boulder Dash / 2: El Toro/ 3: Prowler/ 4: Voyage/ 5: Hades
Top Steelies: 1: DRAGON KHAN / 2: Expedition Geforce / 3: Top Thrill Dragster/ 4: Goliath (Holland) / 5: Superman (Madrid)

Image

"Excuse me, miss, may I pound my large rooster into your donkey?"
User avatar
 
Posts: 1149
Joined: 12 Jun 2005
Location: Sitting in a corner pissing my pants
Gender: Male
Age: 39

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby eddie200330 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 4:46 pm

galindoverhere wrote:
greg spalding wrote:I'm not impressed by this at all. I just looks very pedestrian and far to similar to Behemoth.

How could you compare this to Behemoth?! Sure they're both B&M's and have the "out and back" layout but Levi is MUCH longer and looks like it provides some more airtime, and try comparing a 200+ Footer to a 300+ Footer. Have you even ridden Levi? Ride it at least once and then tell us your opinion again. I'm not trying to be rude, but I don't think you should criticize a ride that you probably don't have any experience on... But this is just my opinion....



"Levi" is only 168' longer than Behemoth. The height of the lift is the difference????
Tshirt # 1.jpg
Viewed 686 times
Life is a lemon and I want my money back????

He who farts in church sits in own pew.............

I prefer to mate with donkeys over humans!
User avatar
 
Posts: 2036
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Gender: Male
Age: 27

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby beatle11 » Sun Apr 29, 2012 6:15 pm

^Yeah the track lengths are very similar. Leviathan is actually the perfect length for the experience. And when you consider it already cost 28 million dollars, adding another 1500 or more feet would be insane. That is an awesome shirt!

PCW_Nut wrote:
greg spalding wrote: The exact same turn is on another B&M right across the park!


You couldn't be further away from the truth on this statement. The hammerhead on Leviathan is far more over banked then the one on Behemoth. Pictures and videos really do not do this ride justice. Get your butt up to Wonderland, ride it, then critique.

Robb, I am with you, I am also an airtime type of guy however I find love in all elements. I've been battling over and over in my head which is better between the two and I've yet to come to a conclusive choice. What I have come to realize though is that Wonderland now has 2 World class B&M's in their park, and that, is nothing but good!



THIS! I personally like Leviathan better because it's smoother and is just a much more unique experience where as Behemoth is basically your standard B&M floater, albeit one of the better ones. Leviathan is not by any means Behemoth 2.0. It's a completely different experience and I am very happy to have 2 awesome B&M's at CW.
Image
Image

I Guess Donkeys Are Okay
 
Posts: 2
Joined: 18 Aug 2011
Gender: None specified

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby pcwarryk » Sun Apr 29, 2012 10:50 pm

Long-time reader, first time poster.

A quick note about the extended break run: from the design of it, it seems that (aside from keeping the pricetag lower), they were trying to avoid too much interaction with Dragon Fire's structure. On top of that, the particular part of the park is also home to Loss Prevention, Maintenance, Human Resources, and the like, and they probably didn't want to have to disturb the pre-existing park structures in building the ride.

PreviousNext

Return to Theme Parks, Roller Coasters, & Donkeys!

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest

These pages are in no way affiliated with nor endorsed by SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Cedar Fair, Legoland, Merlin Entertainment,
Blackstone, Tussaud's Group, Six Flags, Universal Theme Parks, the Walt Disney Company or any other theme park company.

All onride photos and videos on this website were taken with the permission of the park by a professional ride photographer.
For yours  and others safety, please do not attempt to take photos or videos at parks without proper permission.

Disclaimer!  You need a sense of humor to view our site, 
if you don't have a sense of humor, or are easily offended, please turn back now!
Most of the content on this forum is suitable for all ages. HOWEVER!
There may be some content that would be considered rated "PG-13."
Theme Park Review is NOT recommended for ages under 13 years of age.

cron