Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK, KK) Discussion Thread

P. 282: Tax incentives are approved
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest
Discuss theme parks, roller coasters, and mules!
Keeper Of The Carnivorous Bees!
User avatar
 
Posts: 11808
Joined: 12 Feb 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Gender: Male

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby Meteornotes » Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:04 am

SharkTums wrote:I really feel that both sides are just being big babies. Yeah, Six Flags did some shady stuff in promising a water park expansion to take Chang, but the Fairgrounds and Louisville wanted NOTHING to do with the park when the chick got her feet cut off, so why do they have the rights to the place now?!?!


Elissa is wise. This totally sums it up. The only people that are going to win here are the lawyers on both sides, who are going to rake in the cash in what is likely to be a very long battle.

dt
Always trying to keep YOU entertained! Now with more Ice Bat!
Image
The world would be a better place if Dave programmed our iPods - Derwood

"Excuse me, miss, may I pound my large rooster into your donkey?"
User avatar
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Gender: Male
Age: 23

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby kidcoaster 2 » Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:00 am

coasterking2981 wrote:I have to agree with the idea about the wording of the contract, although I'm kinda siding with Six Flags on basis that they were still given permission to remove Chang. If SF was allowed to remove a ride on the land owned by the state fairgrounds, then isn't the ride itself now owned by SF because it is no longer on state fairground property?


Well Six Flags did promise a water park expansion in exchange for removing Chang. So if the rides do belong to the board and if they put the deal in writing than it will only help the board.

TPR's RCT2 Expert
User avatar
 
Posts: 1122
Joined: 03 Apr 2006
Location: Dayton, Oh
Gender: Male
Age: 41

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby dmaxsba2408 » Wed Feb 24, 2010 11:33 am

SharkTums wrote:...but the Fairgrounds and Louisville wanted NOTHING to do with the park when the chick got her feet cut off, so why do they have the rights to the place now?!?!


Correct me if I am wrong but Six Flags was in control of all ride and park maintenance at the time of the accident. Why would the people who leased the land and rides to Six Flags be responsible for any mechanical problems with the ride. That's like saying if you walk into a leased building that is being maintained by the leasee (thank you cfc) and slip you should be able to go after the lessor when they had no control over it at the time. I would think if the ride had totally collapsed to the ground because of a problem during it's construction and Six Flags was leasing the park at the time it would come back on the Fairgrounds and whatever contractor they worked with. That kind of incident would not be a maintenance issue.

This whole mess still goes back to who's in control of what, when and to what extent. Really makes me think leasing land for any reason is a super bad idea!
Image

Full Fledged Donkey Enthusiast!
User avatar
 
Posts: 101
Joined: 22 Jul 2008
Location: Somewhere in Kentucky
Gender: Male
Age: 16

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby holidayworld08 » Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:54 pm

^They are a little slow in Kentucky.


You're hilarious. :| Anyways, the expo center should just let this die and forget about the park. And if they do want to keep the park, they should STFU about SF and find a new buyer. By the way, I never cared for SFKK;it was dirty, and the staff was always rude. There are other parks to go to, but I guess they never realized that and gave up on pleasing guests.

token black guy
User avatar
 
Posts: 2814
Joined: 16 Feb 2005
Location: Columbia, S.C.
Gender: Male
Age: 31

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby jarmor » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:14 pm

Looking at the surface, that was a lil shady of SF to take a ride they didnt install. Personally I think the best thing is to give it back...just sayin'

I wish they would make Street Fighter Donkey.
User avatar
 
Posts: 939
Joined: 02 Jan 2006
Location: Alexandria, VA / Washington DC
Gender: Male
Age: 26

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby Capitalize » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:25 pm

Wasn't Chang built after Premier Parks took over?

East Coast Wes don't smell, honest.
 
Posts: 290
Joined: 06 Nov 2009
Gender: Male
Age: 23

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby bgwfreak777 » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:27 pm

OK let's say you are renting a house, and you put a bunch of stuff in that house.

Then you decide to leave, all that stuff is still yours. So I can see Six Flags' point, but at the same time if say I build a deck on that house I was renting, I couldn't exactly take it with me. :lol:

I Love Donkeys!
User avatar
 
Posts: 33
Joined: 15 Feb 2010
Location: End of 294 South
Gender: Male
Age: 27

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby squirrelnut1416 » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:29 pm

^ the thing is you could take the deck with you, it would just be very impractical.

"Excuse me, miss, may I pound my large rooster into your donkey?"
User avatar
 
Posts: 1164
Joined: 24 Mar 2008
Location: Western Pennsylvania
Gender: Male
Age: 23

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby kidcoaster 2 » Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:38 pm

Capitalize wrote:Wasn't Chang built after Premier Parks took over?


No Chang opened for the 1997 season and they didn't sell the park to Premier till after the 1997 season was over.

Donkeys give me orgiastic scream!
 
Posts: 117
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Location: Louisville Kentucky
Gender: Male

Re: The Six Flags Kentucky Kingdom (SFKK) Discussion Thread

Postby lilsam1993 » Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:12 pm

holidayworld08 wrote:
^They are a little slow in Kentucky.


You're hilarious. :| Anyways, the expo center should just let this die and forget about the park. And if they do want to keep the park, they should STFU about SF and find a new buyer. By the way, I never cared for SFKK;it was dirty, and the staff was always rude. There are other parks to go to, but I guess they never realized that and gave up on pleasing guests.


If they let it go their will be no more Kentucky Kingdom. Kentucky Kingdom use to be fun and not dirty until Six Flags took over. Every park isn't clean anyways, they all are about the same.

I still don't get Six Flags, When I worked their in 2008, they told everyone that the park was going to reopen Twisted Twins in 2009 and Mile High Falls too. The park was also going to have a Thomas Town Tank engine attraction in the North West Territory of the park that year, but 2009 came and nothing was there! Then in the middle of the summer of last year twisted twins trains were sent off to SFSL! What the freak is Six Flags problem? It seems they thought this all out last year! They never gave this park a chance!

PreviousNext

Return to Theme Parks, Roller Coasters, & Donkeys!

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest

These pages are in no way affiliated with nor endorsed by SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Cedar Fair, Legoland, Merlin Entertainment,
Blackstone, Tussaud's Group, Six Flags, Universal Theme Parks, the Walt Disney Company or any other theme park company.

All onride photos and videos on this website were taken with the permission of the park by a professional ride photographer.
For yours  and others safety, please do not attempt to take photos or videos at parks without proper permission.

Disclaimer!  You need a sense of humor to view our site, 
if you don't have a sense of humor, or are easily offended, please turn back now!
Most of the content on this forum is suitable for all ages. HOWEVER!
There may be some content that would be considered rated "PG-13."
Theme Park Review is NOT recommended for ages under 13 years of age.

cron