Kings Island (KI) Discussion Thread

P. 559: World's largest dino animatronic coming in 2013!
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 2 guests
Discuss theme parks, roller coasters, and mules!
Donkeys give me orgiastic scream!
User avatar
 
Posts: 116
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Gender: Male

Postby cjeagle35 » Mon Feb 05, 2007 6:57 pm

coastrfreak2000 wrote:So you guys are telling me the GP is "dumb"? They don't give a rat's flying a$$ about coasters and parks! Yes we like roller coasters, but is it necessary to call others dumb because they don't have the same hobby as we do?


It would be totally wrong to call the GP dumb. They just don't have the coaster knowledge as all of us. Most just haven't heard of X-Flight or GL. The ride will be new to them simply because they don't know about its history. They don't know that there are better rides than Firehawk. So are they dumb? Definatly not, they just haven't experianced as many parks as we have. However does this even make a difference to them? No, they will enjoy Firehawk and they will enjoy their time at KI. Will they really care that they got a used Vekoma Flyer rather than a B&M? No, all they know is KI got a new ride, its fun and I had a good time. Therefore I'll be willing to spend money to go there, and I'll come back some day.

Why do I still have a donkey title???
User avatar
 
Posts: 5479
Joined: 28 May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 35

Postby ginzo » Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:16 pm

cjeagle35 wrote:As long as your park resides in a huge metropolitain area and you get a huge number of season passholders by updating kiddy attractions, your park will be financially successful.


Explain SFMM then.

If you look at top 10 US parks in terms of attendance, they are all run by Disney, Univeral, and Busch. Not coincidentally, those companies invest the most into their parks. They have awesome parks with top quality attractions. Your "fool the GP with cheap crap" model might allow you to skate by, but you're not going to see rapid growth in attendance/profits.

And if PKI and Canada's Wonderland were so financially successful, why did Paramount want to dump them so badly? You don't unload cash cows.

Fluffy, Fluffy, Donkeys Filled With Medicine and Goo!
User avatar
 
Posts: 904
Joined: 28 Jul 2006
Location: Fontana
Gender: Male
Age: 21

Postby ghost007jas » Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:22 pm

You guys do realize that when people say that the GP is dumb they mean they have zero coaster and theme park knowledge.

I think this is an excellent move by cedar fair. I have had the pleasure of experiencing a Vekoma flyer and if this is anything like PGA's stealth then I dont see what you gus are complaining about. It is a new coaster after all and a nice addition to the park. It may not be a new coaster but to the GP it may as well be.....Basically I mean to say that I dont get what you guys are complaining about. Looks like a nice coaster and hey its a new coaster if nothing else.

Donkeys give me orgiastic scream!
User avatar
 
Posts: 116
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Gender: Male

Postby cjeagle35 » Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:35 pm

ginzo wrote:Explain SFMM then.

Wait, I thought SFMM's attendence has been slipping lately? The general public cares much more about service than they do about great attractions. SFMM has gotten great rides lately, yet there attendence isn't that great because guests want to have a good time firstly. If the rides are fun, and they park treats them well, they'll spend money there. On the other hand, if a park has every type of B&M coaster avalible, but doesn't run them consistantly, doesn't run them to full capacity, and the park is dirty and the workers rude, they won't be willing to spend their money there.

ginzo wrote:If you look at top 10 US parks in terms of attendance, they are all run by Disney, Univeral, and Busch. Not coincidentally, those companies invest the most into their parks.


Right, of course they are. That is because they are resort experiances and can run all year long. Unlike KI which mostly attracts season pass holders and the local public, and runs for only half the year. Disney can afford to offer the best attractions, they make exponentially more money than KI.

ginzo wrote:They have awesome parks with top quality attractions. Your "fool the GP with cheap crap" model might allow you to skate by, but you're not going to see rapid growth in attendance/profits.


How is KI going to get rapid growth in attendence? Southwest Ohio is definatly not an growing part of the country, and it is definatly not the tourism spot that Florida is. Parks like KI have seemed to reach a plateau in attendence. But Firehawk will raise attendence for a year or 2, allowing the park to make money. Thats all they want from this attraction.

ginzo wrote:And if PKI and Canada's Wonderland were so financially successful, why did Paramount want to dump them so badly? You don't unload cash cows.


Basically, because CBS wanted out of the amusement parks business, that was it. The parks are certainly successful, that is why they are getting new attractions.

Why do I still have a donkey title???
User avatar
 
Posts: 5479
Joined: 28 May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 35

Postby ginzo » Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:09 pm

cjeagle35 wrote:How is KI going to get rapid growth in attendence?


By having a park that doesn't suck. They could start with installing better rides; rides that don't give you a headache.

cjeagle35 wrote:Basically, because CBS wanted out of the amusement parks business, that was it. The parks are certainly successful, that is why they are getting new attractions.


They were making their numbers, but obviously it wasn't a cash machine. I don't think it's crazy to assume that they'd make more money with nicer parks. But that takes someone with Walt Disney-like balls. And they didn't have it.

The whole Paramount Parks concept was pretty half-cocked. But, it didn't have to be that way. One idea would be to not name rides after movies that nobody has seen, like Face Off.

Donkeys give me orgiastic scream!
User avatar
 
Posts: 116
Joined: 23 Jan 2007
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Gender: Male

Postby cjeagle35 » Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:23 pm

ginzo wrote:By having a park that doesn't suck. They could start with installing better rides; rides that don't give you a headache.


That gets back to the main reason why we are having this arguement. People will still come if they build second rate rides. So why spend the money to build something better? The only way KI could have the huge growth you describe would be to become a resort destination, like CP. However, we all know CF doesn't want that to happen.

ginzo wrote:They were making their numbers, but obviously it wasn't a cash machine. I don't think it's crazy to assume that they'd make more money with nicer parks. But that takes someone with Walt Disney-like balls. And they didn't have it.


Why would it be logical to put a Disney-like park in Southwest Ohio? KI was a regonial amusement park, and it will stay a regional amusement park.

ginzo wrote:The whole Paramount Parks concept was pretty half-cocked. But, it didn't have to be that way. One idea would be to not name rides after movies that nobody has seen, like Face Off.


I certainly agree with you on this, Paramount definatly messed up some very beautiful parks. At one time, with Bat, Beast, King Cobra, and Vortex, KI was the industry leader. But Paramount didn't feel world class rides were worth it, at least not at KI, where you have to compete with CP.

Why do I still have a donkey title???
User avatar
 
Posts: 5479
Joined: 28 May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 35

Postby ginzo » Mon Feb 05, 2007 8:35 pm

cjeagle35 wrote:That gets back to the main reason why we are having this arguement. People will still come if they build second rate rides. So why spend the money to build something better?


Because they might actually come back a few times in one season if they don't leave the first time with a headache. Higher quality rides tend to break less as well. They could have built a really nice hyper with the money they incinerated on SOB.

cjeagle35 wrote:Why would it be logical to put a Disney-like park in Southwest Ohio? KI was a regonial amusement park, and it will stay a regional amusement park.


It doesn't have to be at that level. But, again, a nicer park would certainly win more business.

cjeagle35 wrote:I certainly agree with you on this, Paramount definatly messed up some very beautiful parks. At one time, with Bat, Beast, King Cobra, and Vortex, KI was the industry leader. But Paramount didn't feel world class rides were worth it, at least not at KI, where you have to compete with CP.


The Paramount Parks thing could have been done in a much better way. A little creativity goes a long way.

2 + 2 = donkey!
User avatar
 
Posts: 459
Joined: 20 May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Gender: Male
Age: 31

Postby CoastersNSich » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:20 pm

robbalvey wrote:Yeah, it totally fits in with all those cheesy low-budget SNES games from the early 90s:


You asked for it, Robb: http://firehawksnes.ytmnd.com/

Why do I still have a donkey title???
User avatar
 
Posts: 5479
Joined: 28 May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 35

Postby ginzo » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:28 pm

CoastersNSich wrote:
robbalvey wrote:Yeah, it totally fits in with all those cheesy low-budget SNES games from the early 90s:


You asked for it, Robb: http://firehawksnes.ytmnd.com/


Nice! I used to be way into YTMND. It hasn't been so great lately. Dickcream.com was better when it was up.

2 + 2 = donkey!
User avatar
 
Posts: 454
Joined: 24 Aug 2005
Location: Mad River Township, Ohio
Gender: Male
Age: 29

Postby TheGreatOne » Mon Feb 05, 2007 9:50 pm

ginzo wrote:I don't see how anyone can defend this awful decision. Here's a few reasons why this blows:

Maverick
Griffon
Flying Turns
Mystery Mine
Renegade

Everyone else seems to be installing awesome rides this year.


I'm not defending the decision, but this reasoning sucks and reeks of Spoiled Enthusiast Syndrome.

Here are some arguments with shreds of legitimacy:

1.) X-Flight has been marred by technical problems from day one. Those problems have been somewhat remedied, but the ride is still prone to awful breakdowns.

2.) The ride has a capacity of 400 riders per train an hour. That is INSANELY low. It has only two operable trains. 800 riders per hour is the MAXIMUM throughput of the ride. That means if the ride ops are slow (and they will be at the beginning trying to figure out how to run this complicated ride) or if a rider gets sick and vomits, you can lose 100 riders per hour somewhat easily.

3.) The ride has so many advanced technologies built into the trains that if one or two minor things go wrong, you can lose a train for most or the entirety of the day. (This is according to someone who "op-ed" the ride at GL) That knocks down capacity to a maximum of 400 riders an hour.

4.) At Geauga Lake, a park that annually gets 1/5th of the attendance of Kings Island, people were waiting at least 30 minutes for the ride on slow days. Why then would you move it to a park that easily has 5 times as many people to jam the lines? There are going to be some angry, angry guests at Kings Island.

See? Those arguments are at least halfway legitimate. If you're whining that KI isn't getting a Maverick or Mystery Mine, get a CF Maxx Pass and go to CP a lot and shill for a Dollywood pass (they're fairly cheap to upgrade from a one-day ticket early in the year) and you can make a few trips to Dollywood to ride Mystery Mine since it's only 5 hours away.

But don't point at what other parks are getting and base it off of what Fireowl is. That just sucks.

I can't say that I'm thrilled with the addition of Fireowl, but I'm hoping it will shorten lines for Delirium and Drop Zone...that will make me happy.

-Bryan "already has his CF Maxx Pass" Wood

PreviousNext

Return to Theme Parks, Roller Coasters, & Donkeys!

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 2 guests

These pages are in no way affiliated with nor endorsed by SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Cedar Fair, Legoland, Merlin Entertainment,
Blackstone, Tussaud's Group, Six Flags, Universal Theme Parks, the Walt Disney Company or any other theme park company.

All onride photos and videos on this website were taken with the permission of the park by a professional ride photographer.
For yours  and others safety, please do not attempt to take photos or videos at parks without proper permission.

Disclaimer!  You need a sense of humor to view our site, 
if you don't have a sense of humor, or are easily offended, please turn back now!
Most of the content on this forum is suitable for all ages. HOWEVER!
There may be some content that would be considered rated "PG-13."
Theme Park Review is NOT recommended for ages under 13 years of age.

cron