Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Leviathan POV Video Posted!
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 2 guests
Discuss theme parks, roller coasters, and mules!
Online
Gimme Some Candy!
User avatar
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Gender: Male
Age: 21

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby coasterfreak101 » Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:31 pm

But don't we use them every time a new coaster that breaks those barriers come out? Shambhala is a hyper, not in a Cedar Fair park? And so are the Supermans, and Steel Dragon is a giga... Sure, it's a marketing term. But we've been using them ever since, so I'm not sure what the problem is.
Last Ride: California Screamin' (DCA)
Next Ride: Intimidator 305 (KD)

Image

Obsessive Overlord of the TPR Park Index
 
Posts: 13538
Joined: 17 Aug 2005
Location: Staten Island, New York
Gender: Male
Age: 46

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby larrygator » Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:41 pm

coasterfreak101 wrote:But don't we use them every time a new coaster that breaks those barriers come out? Shambhala is a hyper, not in a Cedar Fair park? And so are the Supermans, and Steel Dragon is a giga... Sure, it's a marketing term. But we've been using them ever since, so I'm not sure what the problem is.


No real problem, but is there really a difference between 199 feet 11 1/2 inches or 200 feet?
Is a 200 foot coaster different than a 299 foot coaster? There are both classified in the same category.
To me a 299 foot coaster has more in common with a 300 foot coaster, yet people argue that one is a hyper and one's a giga.

Then again I'm one of those people that has never used those terms when refering to a coaster. I just state the real height.
Last edited by larrygator on Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:41 pm.
As usual, my analysis is free of charge!
Original enough to not steal someone else's quote as a signature

Image
Image

Online
Gimme Some Candy!
User avatar
 
Posts: 4104
Joined: 28 Apr 2005
Location: Annapolis, Maryland
Gender: Male
Age: 21

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby coasterfreak101 » Tue Nov 22, 2011 8:43 pm

I agree with you there, I'm just one for categories, I suppose. The only reason I brought it up is that most would agree that Magnum is a "hyper," so by that same logic even if Leviathan's drop didn't break 300' then it would still too be considered a "giga." For those who care about those labels, of course.

But really though I just like roller coasters, and I need to dig out my passport for this next summer!
Last Ride: California Screamin' (DCA)
Next Ride: Intimidator 305 (KD)

Image

Don't make me kick you in the donkey!
User avatar
 
Posts: 1955
Joined: 06 May 2010
Location: Intimidator 305, Row 16
Gender: Male

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby braztaz » Tue Nov 22, 2011 10:48 pm

^^That's something that's always bugged me as well; like when someone says Griffon is better than Sheikra because it's "taller". Do you really notice that you're five feet higher up than before? Do you really say "Oh wow, this definitely feels like 205 feet!".

That little of a difference in height has never mattered to me, either.
Reality is a lovely place, but I wouldn't wanna live there.

Harry Potter is a sick donkey.
User avatar
 
Posts: 70
Joined: 22 Oct 2011
Gender: Male
Age: 22

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby swiver » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:24 pm

^Well I don't really like Griffon better than SheiKra because it's higher. I like it better because it has weird and random airtime hills, whereas SheiKra kind of just turns back into the station.

But on a Canada's Wonderland related note, this first drop on Leviathan looks like it's gonna be insane. I'd even dare to say that it's probably going to have the best airtime of any hill on a B&M coaster.

Why do I still have a donkey title???
User avatar
 
Posts: 3481
Joined: 17 Apr 2009
Location: Portland, Oregon
Gender: Female
Age: 23

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby cal1br3tto » Tue Nov 22, 2011 11:31 pm

I don't mind using the common terms, but I do think of them more as referring to styles of coasters that most commonly fall into a certain height range. To me, mini-hypers like Steel Eel and Goliath at La Ronde might as well be true hypers, and Millennium Force is basically just an oversized hyper.

If this is anything like my favorite B&M hypers and/or my lone gigacoaster credit, I'm sure I'll love it.
[Boulder Dash | Coaster | Voyage | Phoenix] [X2 | Maverick | NTag] | Coaster-Count
Six Flags America: A Place That I Went To


Image

A donkey is a domesticated member of the Equidae or horse family.
User avatar
 
Posts: 660
Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada
Gender: Male
Age: 32

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby PCW_Nut » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:47 am

larrygator wrote:
coasterfreak101 wrote:But don't we use them every time a new coaster that breaks those barriers come out? Shambhala is a hyper, not in a Cedar Fair park? And so are the Supermans, and Steel Dragon is a giga... Sure, it's a marketing term. But we've been using them ever since, so I'm not sure what the problem is.


No real problem, but is there really a difference between 199 feet 11 1/2 inches or 200 feet?
Is a 200 foot coaster different than a 299 foot coaster? There are both classified in the same category.
To me a 299 foot coaster has more in common with a 300 foot coaster, yet people argue that one is a hyper and one's a giga.

Then again I'm one of those people that has never used those terms when refering to a coaster. I just state the real height.


Marketing tool or not, ever since height has been a major selling point on a coaster and names have been given to each category the following seems to have been true:

200-299ft: Hyper/Mega
300-399ft - Giga
400+ - Strata

I agree that the comparison if the ride is a foot taller then another is clear as day, but just like people's heights, if you're 4'8" than you can be legally considered a "little person", whereas if you're 4"9" you cannot.
Image

I wrote the book about donkeys!
User avatar
 
Posts: 430
Joined: 23 Jul 2006
Location: Toronto
Gender: Male
Age: 28

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby kunpc1 » Wed Nov 23, 2011 4:50 am

The drop will be more than 306'.
Image

A donkey is a domesticated member of the Equidae or horse family.
User avatar
 
Posts: 660
Joined: 15 Jun 2005
Location: Toronto, ON. Canada
Gender: Male
Age: 32

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby PCW_Nut » Wed Nov 23, 2011 6:50 am

^Hmmm, as always coming in with the top secret information. Love it!

But I am not surprised. There honestly is no other reason for this trench if not to break a certain height/drop goal. They easily could have ditched the trench and just adjusted accordingly.

So excited to be on the verge of a possible world record coaster rather then just a Canadian record holder.
Image

This B&M donkey is so smooth!
 
Posts: 138
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Gender: Male
Age: 18

Re: Canada's Wonderland Discussion Thread

Postby sixflagsgadvguy1000 » Wed Nov 23, 2011 7:42 am

Leviathan is looking pretty sweet!

PreviousNext

Return to Theme Parks, Roller Coasters, & Donkeys!

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 2 guests

These pages are in no way affiliated with nor endorsed by SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Cedar Fair, Legoland, Merlin Entertainment,
Blackstone, Tussaud's Group, Six Flags, Universal Theme Parks, the Walt Disney Company or any other theme park company.

All onride photos and videos on this website were taken with the permission of the park by a professional ride photographer.
For yours  and others safety, please do not attempt to take photos or videos at parks without proper permission.

Disclaimer!  You need a sense of humor to view our site, 
if you don't have a sense of humor, or are easily offended, please turn back now!
Most of the content on this forum is suitable for all ages. HOWEVER!
There may be some content that would be considered rated "PG-13."
Theme Park Review is NOT recommended for ages under 13 years of age.

cron