Walt Disney World Epcot Discussion Thread

P. 127 - Spaceship Earth turned into a GIANT Mike Wazowski!
Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest
Discuss theme parks, roller coasters, and mules!
"Excuse me, miss, may I pound my large rooster into your donkey?"
User avatar
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: 16 May 2005
Location: las vegas, nv
Gender: Male
Age: 29

Postby haiderodes » Thu Apr 13, 2006 10:56 am

SharkTums wrote:Again, you have to remember that even with the 'short' lines that Mission: Space has, it still puts through SOOOOO many people that it's more likely to have an accident than some random roundup.

I don't think it pulls anymore G's than most rides, if anything, I think it's Gary Sinise's fault. He hypes up the ride so much and scares people so that their heart is racing, then you ride the ride and it's really not that bad! Come on, even I can ride it multiple times!


In a way, I think Elissa could be right. I think the suspense of not knowing exactly how its going to feel may play a factor in it. I also think the theming and everything that makes the experience so exciting, adds to the perceived forces.

Like someone else mentioned, I have never EVER seen a ride that has that many warnings about whats going to happen. They not only mention spinning, they show it...OVER AND OVER AGAIN! Maybe people just think Disney rides are calm and ignore the warnings (already mentioned)? I mean if people are ignoring them, that can't really be Disney's fault...in theory of course.

Yes Mission:Space is unique, its has its intense aspects, but there are much more intense attractions out there.

.
User avatar
 
Posts: 11940
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Location: Like, The Valley OMG
Gender: Male
Age: 30

Postby Wes » Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:10 am

haiderodes wrote:Yes Mission:Space is unique, its has its intense aspects, but there are much more intense attractions out there.


But not at Disney. M:S is probably the most intense Disney ride ever, in terms of forces. People expect Disney rides to be exciting, but maybe not as crazy as something from Six Flags. Disney has set a standard that their attractions are geared towards families. They obviously have EVERY RIGHT to build whatever kind of ride they want, but the public perception is always going to be that Disney builds tame rides. I can guarantee you there's been thousands and thousands of people who were completely caught off guard by M:S's intensity, despite the numerous warnings.

Another problem/issue is that you obviously can't see the ride before you board. Even with the safety videos and all that, people are going to think "Hey, it's just spinning, big deal!", whereas the same person would see an out in the open roller coaster like Hulk and decide they probably shouldn't ride it.
Image

Site Admin
User avatar
 
Posts: 27371
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Location: Swimming in the Ocean
Gender: Female
Age: 32

Postby SharkTums » Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:16 am

^I disagree on one of your points. I feel that for the General Public Rock n Roller Coaster and even EE are more intense than mission space. Let's use my mom as typical GP (which she is, trust me!) She was more willing to go on a spinning ride than a ride that Launches, goes upside down, or a ride that goes backwards.

You can't see Rock n Roller coaster, it launches and goes upsidedown several times. (And depending on where and what train you ride it, bashes your skull!)

Yes Mission Space probably sustains more G-Forces, but I dont' feel it's anymore intense than some of the other Disney rides. People have heart attacks at Disney every day, you just don't hear about them when they happen as the person is eating, or walking through world showcase!

Haven't at least 2 or 3 people died on Hulk? 2 on Kumba? You don't hear people calling for those rides to be changed.

.
User avatar
 
Posts: 11940
Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Location: Like, The Valley OMG
Gender: Male
Age: 30

Postby Wes » Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:26 am

^ I think what I was trying to say and what you were trying to say is similar, my wording was probably poor. Your mom would probably choose to go (heh) on M:S over RnRC because RnRC is perceived as being more intense, since it's a roller coaster that goes upside down. People think they can handle a ride that "just spins" versus one that launched and goes through loops. The woman who died might have opted out of riding RnRC.
I bet the ride ops on M:S probably get "Is this a roller coaster?" quite a bit, and when they say no, the people who wouldn't normally ride Everest or RnRC think it's okay to go on. Roller coasters obviously carry a perceived notion, whereas since Mission: Space is hard to explain in terms of the ride and the sensations, more people get on it not knowing what its going to be like.

I still feel that the overall experience on Mission: Space is far more intense that Rock N Roller Coaster. Space made me light headed and a little dizzy, RnRC made me just hate Steven Tyler.
Image

Site Admin
User avatar
 
Posts: 27371
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Location: Swimming in the Ocean
Gender: Female
Age: 32

Postby SharkTums » Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:30 am

^Wait a minute, I love that idea!

Site Admin
User avatar
 
Posts: 37264
Joined: 01 Feb 2005
Location: Orlando, FL
Gender: Male

Postby robbalvey » Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:38 am

I also just want to point out that there are statistically more injuries on the parking lot tram at Disney's on both coasts, yet you don't see a big deal being made over that.

--Robb
Club TPR is here! Register NOW!
TPR is on: Twitter | Face Book | YouTube
This is my life: http://theoatmeal.com/comics/making_things

Image

Team Alcide!
User avatar
 
Posts: 1477
Joined: 19 Sep 2005
Location: Tampa Bay, FL
Gender: Male
Age: 38

Postby live2tell75 » Thu Apr 13, 2006 12:12 pm

I love Mission Space. I have been on it a gazillion times. But everytime I go, with all the warnings during the line I still wonder in the back of my mind, could this be the time that MS is going to cause a medical condtion to surface in me that I had no idea about. I get over it and I always love the ride. But I could see how people could get stressed out about the whole expeience. The build up in the preshows can make your heart race. Ok, I agree it's Gary Sinese's fault!

-Eric J

"Excuse me, miss, may I pound my large rooster into your donkey?"
User avatar
 
Posts: 1147
Joined: 16 May 2005
Location: las vegas, nv
Gender: Male
Age: 29

Postby haiderodes » Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:34 pm

robbalvey wrote:I also just want to point out that there are statistically more injuries on the parking lot tram at Disney's on both coasts, yet you don't see a big deal being made over that.

--Robb


Right on Robb!

As a past Disney parking host...let me tell you people got hurt all the time. Granted 99.9% of the time it was thier fault for not paying attention and not following directions but it happened. There was no news coverage.

IMO, I think the Mission:Space hoopla has to deal with how they marketed the ride as well. They said it was the most intense attraction ever, reguardless of the physical reality of g-forces. People will take most intense and turn it into something thats on the edge of being safe/unsafe. We were talking about this very sort of mental game in my Media and Society class yesterday.

There are a lot of attractions people get hurt on. Hell, I was at the movies last night and someone fell UP the stairs.

Former captain of the Arrow bus.
User avatar
 
Posts: 6668
Joined: 12 Jun 2005
Location: Gainesville, Florida
Gender: Male
Age: 40

Postby Erik Johnson » Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:53 pm

I do not know what more WDW has to do to warn people about the intensity of the ride. They certainly do have the most extensive warning sign in front of this attraction I have ever seen. Also our friend Gary warns everyone about the ride at least 3 or 4 times in the pre-show. Several times, via a computer generated model, they show park guests how the ride works before you actually board. Once while you are waiting for the pre-show, and another time in the 2nd section on the pre-show.
DSC06389.JPG
Yes, this is quite extensive IMO.
Viewed 885 times
DSC06397.JPG
There are plenty of these screens before you board
Viewed 885 times

Idiot.
User avatar
 
Posts: 1618
Joined: 17 Jun 2005
Location: Somewhere in the US
Gender: Male

Postby waterviper » Thu Apr 13, 2006 1:54 pm

Maybe now Mission:Space will get the Alien Encounter treatment.
Instead of Mission:Space it will be called Mission:Stitch.
There wont be any more centrifuge. It would just be like a regular simulator like Star Tours where you go on some sort of mission with Stitch being the pilot as all hell breaks loose just like Star Tours.
I can totally see that happening!
Im your Huckleberry!

PreviousNext

Return to Theme Parks, Roller Coasters, & Donkeys!

Who is online

Users viewing this topic: No registered users and 1 guest

These pages are in no way affiliated with nor endorsed by SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, Cedar Fair, Legoland, Merlin Entertainment,
Blackstone, Tussaud's Group, Six Flags, Universal Theme Parks, the Walt Disney Company or any other theme park company.

All onride photos and videos on this website were taken with the permission of the park by a professional ride photographer.
For yours  and others safety, please do not attempt to take photos or videos at parks without proper permission.

Disclaimer!  You need a sense of humor to view our site, 
if you don't have a sense of humor, or are easily offended, please turn back now!
Most of the content on this forum is suitable for all ages. HOWEVER!
There may be some content that would be considered rated "PG-13."
Theme Park Review is NOT recommended for ages under 13 years of age.

cron